Conceptual nominee

Is the landscape something concrete, which can be identified by clearly recognizable qualities? Or is it a fantasized abstraction, an idea that is only real in our minds?
The landscape is a culturally interpreted territory. It becomes recognized as a landscape by the historical man's gaze, it is not a natural emergency.

The gaze precedes the territory and formulates it. The Territory must be subjected to the intervention of the cultural gaze to bearing in landscape, that is, as a sample of a aesthetic formulation that precedes and authorizes.
Is that the ray of light that interrupts will transform the landscape into one place, introducing time?

I returned to photography, after having been in it in my youth, about ten years ago, and it returned in an explosive way. I was interested, and I am still interested in street photography, observing people involved in their world, popular concentrations, and theatre photography. I'm still in the search, maybe now more conceptually, Interested in a work on the origin, the body, the house, the journey in which we are embarked.
I'm a psychoanalyst. Perhaps that makes me intrigue and address the human subject in a particular way, in the unfathomable relationship with his body, the desire in the broad sense, and the link with the other.
I have participated in several calls in my country and abroad, with results that have enriched my look.
I live and work in Buenos Aires, Argentina.